{"id":2145,"date":"2025-09-27T11:35:28","date_gmt":"2025-09-27T09:35:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/?page_id=2145"},"modified":"2026-02-23T10:57:32","modified_gmt":"2026-02-23T09:57:32","slug":"e-adl-validierungsstudien","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/en\/e-adl-validierungsstudien\/","title":{"rendered":"Validation Studies &#8211; E-ADL"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Here, you can find all the information on the construction and validation of the <strong>Erlangen Test of Activities of Daily Living (E-ADL)<\/strong>. If you have any further questions or suggestions, please do not hesitate to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/en\/kontakt\/\">contact us<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\"><strong>Item Construction<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">The E-ADL was <strong>developed<\/strong> and <strong>validated<\/strong> in three steps by Graessel et al. in 2009. The test was later revalidated by Luttenberger et al. (2012).<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-2272\" src=\"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/E-ADL_Figure_EN-300x142.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"641\" height=\"303\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/E-ADL_Figure_EN-300x142.png 300w, https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/E-ADL_Figure_EN-1024x486.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/E-ADL_Figure_EN-1536x729.png 1536w, https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/E-ADL_Figure_EN-1454x690.png 1454w, https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/E-ADL_Figure_EN.png 1875w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 641px) 100vw, 641px\" \/><\/p>\n<div class=\"rrze-elements accordion style_default\" id=\"accordion-0\">\n<div class=\"accordion-group med\">\n<h2 class=\"accordion-heading\"><button class=\"accordion-toggle\" data-toggle=\"collapse\"  href=\"#collapse_0\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"collapse_0\" id=\"collapse_button_0\"> First Validation Study (Graessel et al., 2009) <\/button><\/h2>\n<div id=\"collapse_0\" class=\"accordion-body\" aria-labelledby=\"collapse_button_0\">\n<div class=\"accordion-inner clearfix\">\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">The <strong>first validation study of the E-ADL test<\/strong> was conducted in 2009 using a sample of 46 people with dementia living in nursing homes (42 women and four men). The average age was 85.9 years (<em>SD<\/em> = 6.6 years).<\/p>\n<div class=\"rrze-elements accordion style_default\" id=\"accordion-1\">\n<div class=\"accordion-group med\">\n<h3 class=\"accordion-heading\"><button class=\"accordion-toggle\" data-toggle=\"collapse\"  href=\"#collapse_1\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"collapse_1\" id=\"collapse_button_1\"> Tools Used <\/button><\/h3>\n<div id=\"collapse_1\" class=\"accordion-body\" aria-labelledby=\"collapse_button_1\">\n<div class=\"accordion-inner clearfix\">\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">The<strong> Global Deterioration Scale<\/strong> (GDS; Reisberg et al., 1982; German version: Ihl &amp; Fr\u00f6hlich, 1991), the <strong>Mini Mental State Examination<\/strong> (MMSE; Folstein et al., 1975), and the <strong>Nurses Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients<\/strong> (NOSGER; Spiegel et al., 1991, 1992) were used to examine <strong>convergent validity<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"accordion-group med\">\n<h3 class=\"accordion-heading\"><button class=\"accordion-toggle\" data-toggle=\"collapse\"  href=\"#collapse_2\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"collapse_2\" id=\"collapse_button_2\"> Validity <\/button><\/h3>\n<div id=\"collapse_2\" class=\"accordion-body\" aria-labelledby=\"collapse_button_2\">\n<div class=\"accordion-inner clearfix\">\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">Moderate correlation coefficients between the total scores of the E-ADL test and the GDS, as well as the total scores of the MMSE and the NOSGER, confirmed the <strong>validity<\/strong> (see table below; Graessel et al., 2009):<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-2147\" src=\"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-09-04-um-09.25.11-300x175.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"730\" height=\"426\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-09-04-um-09.25.11-300x175.png 300w, https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-09-04-um-09.25.11-1024x598.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-09-04-um-09.25.11-768x449.png 768w, https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-09-04-um-09.25.11-1536x898.png 1536w, https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-09-04-um-09.25.11-986x576.png 986w, https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-09-04-um-09.25.11-1181x690.png 1181w, https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-09-04-um-09.25.11.png 1944w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 730px) 100vw, 730px\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"accordion-group med\">\n<h3 class=\"accordion-heading\"><button class=\"accordion-toggle\" data-toggle=\"collapse\"  href=\"#collapse_3\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"collapse_3\" id=\"collapse_button_3\"> Reliability <\/button><\/h3>\n<div id=\"collapse_3\" class=\"accordion-body\" aria-labelledby=\"collapse_button_3\">\n<div class=\"accordion-inner clearfix\">\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\"><strong>Internal consistency<\/strong>: Cronbach&#8217;s alpha was .77.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">The correlations between the respective items are shown in the following table (see Graessel et al., 2009):<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-2148\" src=\"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-09-04-um-09.28.37-300x149.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"551\" height=\"274\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-09-04-um-09.28.37-300x149.png 300w, https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-09-04-um-09.28.37-1024x509.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-09-04-um-09.28.37-768x382.png 768w, https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-09-04-um-09.28.37-1536x764.png 1536w, https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-09-04-um-09.28.37-1387x690.png 1387w, https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/09\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-09-04-um-09.28.37.png 1612w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 551px) 100vw, 551px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">The <strong>test-retest reliability<\/strong> after 14 days of the entire test was .73 (<em>p<\/em> &lt; .001). The following values were obtained for the individual items (see Graessel et al., 2009):<\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 50%\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 50%\"><strong>Retest Reliability<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 50%\">Pouring a drink<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 50%\">r = 0.35 (<em>p<\/em> = 0.024)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 50%\">Cutting a piece of bread<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 50%\">r = 0.56 (<em>p<\/em> &lt; 0.001)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 50%\">Opening a small cupboard<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 50%\">r = 0.59 (<em>p<\/em> &lt; 0.001)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 50%\">Washing hands<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 50%\">r = 0.63 (<em>p<\/em> &lt; 0.001)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 50%\">Tying a bow<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 50%\">r = 0.48 (<em>p<\/em> = 0.001)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"accordion-group med\">\n<h3 class=\"accordion-heading\"><button class=\"accordion-toggle\" data-toggle=\"collapse\"  href=\"#collapse_4\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"collapse_4\" id=\"collapse_button_4\"> Literature <\/button><\/h3>\n<div id=\"collapse_4\" class=\"accordion-body\" aria-labelledby=\"collapse_button_4\">\n<div class=\"accordion-inner clearfix\">\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. andMcHugh, P. R. (1975). \u201cMini-mental state\u201d: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. <em>Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12,<\/em> 189\u2013198.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">Graessel, E., Viegas, R., Stemmer, R., K\u00fcchly, B., Kornhuber, J., &amp; Donath, C. (2009). The Erlangen Test of Activities of Daily Living: first results on reliability and validity of a short performance test to measure fundamental activities of daily living in dementia patients.\u00a0<i>International Psychogeriatrics<\/i>,\u00a0<i>21<\/i>(1), 103-112.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">Ihl, R. and Fr\u00f6hlich, L. (1991). Die Reisberg-Skalen GDS, CRS, FAST [The Reisberg Scales GDS, CRS, FAST], Weinheim: Beltz Test.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">Reisberg, B., Ferris, S. H., Leon, M. J. de and Crook, T. (1982). The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia.<em> American Journal of Psychiatry, 139<\/em>, 1136\u20131139.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">Spiegel, R. (1992). Erfassung des Verhaltens psychogeriatrischer Patienten im Alltag mit der NOSGER [Recording the behaviour of psycho-geriatric patients in daily life using NOSGER]. In N. I. Jovic and A. Uchtenhagen (eds.), Ambulante Psychogeriatrie: neue Wege und Hinweise f\u00fcr die Praxis [Outpatient Psychogeriatrics: New Ways and Tips]. Kr\u00f6ning: Roland Asanger Verlag.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">Spiegel, R. et al. (1991). A new behavioral assessment scale for geriatric out- and inpatients: the NOSGER (Nurses\u2019 Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients). <em>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 39<\/em>, 339\u2013347.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"rrze-elements accordion style_default\" id=\"accordion-2\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"accordion-group med\">\n<h3 class=\"accordion-heading\"><button class=\"accordion-toggle\" data-toggle=\"collapse\"  href=\"#collapse_5\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"collapse_5\" id=\"collapse_button_5\"> Revalidation Study (Luttenberger et al., 2012) <\/button><\/h3>\n<div id=\"collapse_5\" class=\"accordion-body\" aria-labelledby=\"collapse_button_5\">\n<div class=\"accordion-inner clearfix\">\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">A <strong>revalidation study<\/strong> of the E-ADL test followed in 2012 by Luttenberger et al. The sample consisted of 139 people with dementia from five nursing homes. They had an average age of 84.7 years (<em>SD<\/em> = 4.9 years), and 83% were women.<\/p>\n<div class=\"rrze-elements accordion style_default\" id=\"accordion-3\">\n<div class=\"accordion-group med\">\n<h3 class=\"accordion-heading\"><button class=\"accordion-toggle\" data-toggle=\"collapse\"  href=\"#collapse_6\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"collapse_6\" id=\"collapse_button_6\"> Tools Used <\/button><\/h3>\n<div id=\"collapse_6\" class=\"accordion-body\" aria-labelledby=\"collapse_button_6\">\n<div class=\"accordion-inner clearfix\">\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">The<strong> Barthel Index, <\/strong>the<strong> ADAS-cog Scale, <\/strong>the <strong>Nurses Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients<\/strong> (NOSGER; Spiegel et al., 1991, 1992) and the <strong>Mini Mental State Examination <\/strong>(MMSE; Folstein et al., 1975) were used to examine validity.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"accordion-group med\">\n<h3 class=\"accordion-heading\"><button class=\"accordion-toggle\" data-toggle=\"collapse\"  href=\"#collapse_7\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"collapse_7\" id=\"collapse_button_7\"> Validity <\/button><\/h3>\n<div id=\"collapse_7\" class=\"accordion-body\" aria-labelledby=\"collapse_button_7\">\n<div class=\"accordion-inner clearfix\">\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\"><strong>Criterion-related validity<\/strong> was tested and confirmed using two hypotheses:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\"><strong>H1<\/strong>: The E-ADL test result is positively correlated with the level of care at the beginning of the study. This correlation increases after 22 months. An eta of .39 (<em>p <\/em>&lt; .001) at the beginning of the study and an eta of .48 (<em>p <\/em>&lt; .001) after 22 months support H1.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\"><strong>H2<\/strong>: An increase in the level of care during the observation period is associated with a greater decline in ADL abilities on the E-ADL test than in cases where the level of care does not change. An average 6-point decrease in ADL abilities on the E-ADL test with an increase in care level compared with a 2-point decrease in ADL abilities in the E-ADL test with no change in care level supports H2.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\"><strong>Construct validity<\/strong> was tested and supported with three hypotheses:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\"><strong>H3<\/strong>: The strongest correlations between the E-ADL test and measurement instruments that measure ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) and IADLs (Instrumental Activities of Daily Living) are found in: (a) the NOSGER subscales \u201cADLs\u201d and \u201cIADLs,\u201d (b) the ADAS-cog subscale \u201cOrientation\/Practice,\u201d and (c) the Barthel Index.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\"><strong>H4<\/strong>: Less pronounced correlations between the E-ADL test and measurement instruments that measure cognitive abilities can be observed in: (a) the NOSGER subscale \u201cMemory,\u201d (b) the ADAS-cog subscales \u201cSpeech\u201d and \u201cMemory,\u201d and (c) the MMSE.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\"><strong>H5<\/strong>: The weakest correlations between the E-ADL test and measurement instruments that measure behavior and mood are observed in: (a) the NOSGER subscale \u201cSocial behavior,\u201d (b) the NOSGER subscale \u201cDisturbing behavior,\u201d and (c) the NOSGER subscale \u201cMood.\u201d<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">Since eight of the 10 correlation coefficients supported H3 to H5, <strong>construct validity was considered to be established<\/strong> (see Luttenberger et al., 2012, Figure 2):<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-1356\" src=\"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/06\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-06-07-um-10.38.40-300x191.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"598\" height=\"381\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/06\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-06-07-um-10.38.40-300x191.png 300w, https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/06\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-06-07-um-10.38.40-1024x651.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/06\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-06-07-um-10.38.40-768x488.png 768w, https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/06\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-06-07-um-10.38.40-906x576.png 906w, https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/files\/2025\/06\/Bildschirmfoto-2025-06-07-um-10.38.40.png 1070w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 598px) 100vw, 598px\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"accordion-group med\">\n<h3 class=\"accordion-heading\"><button class=\"accordion-toggle\" data-toggle=\"collapse\"  href=\"#collapse_8\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"collapse_8\" id=\"collapse_button_8\"> Reliability <\/button><\/h3>\n<div id=\"collapse_8\" class=\"accordion-body\" aria-labelledby=\"collapse_button_8\">\n<div class=\"accordion-inner clearfix\">\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\"><strong>Internal consistency: <\/strong>Cronbach&#8217;s alpha for the entire sample was <strong>.68<\/strong>. In terms of the individual subgroups, Cronbach&#8217;s alpha was <strong>.37<\/strong> for people with mild dementia, <strong>.64<\/strong> for people with moderate dementia, and <strong>.73<\/strong> for people with severe dementia.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"accordion-group med\">\n<h3 class=\"accordion-heading\"><button class=\"accordion-toggle\" data-toggle=\"collapse\"  href=\"#collapse_9\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"collapse_9\" id=\"collapse_button_9\"> Literature <\/button><\/h3>\n<div id=\"collapse_9\" class=\"accordion-body\" aria-labelledby=\"collapse_button_9\">\n<div class=\"accordion-inner clearfix\">\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. andMcHugh, P. R. (1975). \u201cMini-mental state\u201d: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. <em>Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12,<\/em> 189\u2013198.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">Graessel, E., Viegas, R., Stemmer, R., K\u00fcchly, B., Kornhuber, J., &amp; Donath, C. (2009). The Erlangen Test of Activities of Daily Living: first results on reliability and validity of a short performance test to measure fundamental activities of daily living in dementia patients.\u00a0<i>International Psychogeriatrics<\/i>,\u00a0<i>21<\/i>(1), 103-112.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">Ihl, R., &amp; Fr\u00f6hlich, L. (1991). Die Reisberg-Skalen GDS, CRS, FAST [The Reisberg Scales GDS, CRS, FAST].<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">Luttenberger, K., Schmiedeberg, A., &amp; Gr\u00e4\u00dfel, E. (2012). Activities of daily living in dementia: revalidation of the E-ADL test and suggestions for further development.\u00a0<i>BMC Psychiatry<\/i>,\u00a0<i>12<\/i>, 1-10.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">Reisberg, B., Ferris, S. H., Leon, M. J. de and Crook, T. (1982). The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia.<em> American Journal of Psychiatry, 139<\/em>, 1136\u20131139.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">Spiegel, R. (1992). Erfassung des Verhaltens psychogeriatrischer Patienten im Alltag mit der NOSGER.\u00a0<i>Ambulante Psychogeriatrie<\/i>, 28-42.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">Spiegel, R. et al. (1991). A new behavioral assessment scale for geriatric out- and inpatients: the NOSGER (Nurses\u2019 Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients). <em>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 39<\/em>, 339\u2013347.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"rrze-elements accordion style_default\" id=\"accordion-4\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"accordion-group med\">\n<h3 class=\"accordion-heading\"><button class=\"accordion-toggle\" data-toggle=\"collapse\"  href=\"#collapse_10\" aria-expanded=\"false\" aria-controls=\"collapse_10\" id=\"collapse_button_10\"> Further Research based on the E-ADL <\/button><\/h3>\n<div id=\"collapse_10\" class=\"accordion-body\" aria-labelledby=\"collapse_button_10\">\n<div class=\"accordion-inner clearfix\">\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 12pt\">Given that interindividual variability and the validity parameters are difficult to differentiate in mild dementia, another performance test was developed for this target group to validly assess everyday practical skills: <strong>the Erlangen Test of Activities of Daily Living in Persons with Mild Dementia or Mild Cognitive Impairment (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/en\/e-tam-aktivitaeten-des-taeglichen-lebens-bei-personen-mit-leichter-demenz-oder-leichten-kognitiven-einschraenkungen\/\">ETAM<\/a>)<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 8pt\">Erlangen Test of Activities of Daily Living (E-ADL); Activities of Daily Living (ADL)<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Here, you can find all the information on the construction and validation of the Erlangen Test of Activities of Daily Living (E-ADL). If you have any further questions or suggestions,&hellip;<!--&hellip;--> <a class=\"more-link fa fa-angle-double-right\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/en\/e-adl-validierungsstudien\/\" title=\"Read more about &quot;Validation Studies - E-ADL&quot;\"><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5160,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_rrze_cache":"enabled","_rrze_multilang_single_locale":"en_GB","_rrze_multilang_single_source":"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/?page_id=1299","footnotes":""},"page_category":[13],"page_tag":[],"class_list":["post-2145","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","page_category-e-adl","en-GB"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2145","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5160"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2145"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2145\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2890,"href":"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/2145\/revisions\/2890"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2145"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"page_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/page_category?post=2145"},{"taxonomy":"page_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.caregiving-tests.de\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/page_tag?post=2145"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}